​

The BPW does not exist, (most likely)

it is possible we are in the BPW but everyone in this world consented to having their freedoms restricted and memory erased. Possibly as a way to experience things form a more limited perspective. In which case, when we die likely we will go back to our soul like forms in the BPW. This is a form of heaven which is possible, unlikely, but possible.

But let's explore what the BPW would look like if it did exist:
 

Strong BPW (THE BPW) — complete picture

1) Core structure

Strong BPW is a reality in which involuntary imposition on the will of any conscious agent is physically impossible, except where that agent has knowingly consented to the relevant constraints.

• Conflict is physically impossible in the shared hub because anything you did not consent to cannot happen to you.

• “Impossibility” applies not only to agent-caused harms but also to nature constraints (aging, bodily limits, time constraints, etc.) in the self/private-property domain.

2) Domains of reality

A) The Self (private core property)

• “Self” = conscious experience and the “body” producing it (in BPW, closer to an immaterial soul).

• Full self-modification is available (appearance, capacities, internal states), subject only to the consent boundary you set.

B) Private worldspace (personal property)

• Every conscious agent has an infinite private worldspace assigned by BPW physics.

• Creator-ownership: anything you create exists in your worldspace and is yours by creation; creation automatically assigns property.

C) Shared space (hub)

• A universal shared hub exists; no one owns it, and no one can change its collective rules.

• It is purely optional/coordination-only: agents start in their private worldspaces and enter the shared hub only by consenting to its rules.

• Shared hub has no physical-body constraints (e.g., multiple agents can occupy the “same seat” without conflict).

D) Group-owned shared worlds

• Agents may create new shared worlds/spaces with mutually chosen rules.

• These are separate from the universal shared hub and do not alter the hub’s rules.

• Group-ownership and governance must be set by agreement/contract prior to creation (or by later explicit sharing).

3) Consent mechanics (how anything happens)

A) Internal consent is the fundamental gate

• In BPW, disclosures are not “required” as an external duty because the key gate is:
  until an agent grants intellectual consent, the relevant thing cannot occur to them.

• Consent is fundamentally mental/intellectual; words are optional expressions for other agents.

B) Entry-based consent packages

• Many permissions can be granted by consenting to enter a given world or space under specified rules.

• Each agent can set acceptance criteria for contact/interactions (opt-in filters).

C) Disturbing content

• Seeing/receiving disturbing content is handled by entry conditions: worlds can require accepting it, allow optional acceptance, or forbid it; entrants may accept/reject within the allowed structure.

4) Time and existence

• Time is optional and settable per will / per world.

• An agent can end their own existence by choice.

• An agent can consent to permanent non-existence (no restore obligation).

5) Logic and physics

• Shared hub: governed by standard logic and fixed non-changeable rules.

• Private worldspaces: owners may instantiate “crazy” / non-standard logic and physics within their pocket universes.

• Cross-world interaction/merging can occur only if all relevant owners consent.

6) Visitors, binding rules, and irrevocable consent

A) Full knowledge requirement for entry

• A visitor must be given full and complete knowledge of the rules and consequences before entry (including future sight where relevant), and must knowingly consent.

B) Rule stability

• Visitors are locked into the rules they consented to at entry.

• Rule changes after entry require separate additional consent.

C) Exit and revocation

• Exit is not automatically guaranteed. A visitor can leave only if the world’s rules permit.

• If rules specify “visitors cannot leave,” and the visitor knowingly consented with full knowledge, then they cannot leave.

• Likewise, if the entry agreement required relinquishing revocation ability, then revocation is not available afterward.

7) Creation of new conscious agents

• You may create non-conscious NPCs / puppets.

• If a conscious agent is created:

  • it must begin with at least a minimum adult-level intellectual capability sufficient for agency/consent,

  • it must be immediately transported to its own private worldspace,

  • it cannot be created with a prescribed belief/value set (must start with a freedom baseline; details to be specified).

8) Ownership and conflict in shared spaces

• Shared hub has no ownership and no conflict.

• Other shared/group worlds: ownership follows creation + contracts (who created it, what sharing was agreed).

Key implications (explicit)

• “BPW exists” entails a universe where self/property-regarding constraints are not imposed by physics; agents can satisfy any self/private-domain states they will, and can select world-rules in their own domains.

• “Irrevocable consent” is coherent in this BPW: a fully informed agent can consent to binding constraints (including no-exit, no-revocation, permanent non-existence).
  
  
  
  
  
   

Weak BPW (Forward BPW) = the closest attainable analogue to THE BPW, where from some point onward the world’s physics and institutions eliminate new non-consensual impositions as far as possible, but past impositions remain true facts and cannot be undone.

You can add it as a distinct definition that explicitly contrasts with Strong BPW.

Weak BPW definition 

Weak BPW (Forward BPW) — Definition (If we could make the world the BPW in future)

Weak BPW is a world-state in which, from a chosen transition point T, involuntary imposition on the will of conscious agents becomes physically prevented and/or systematically eliminated to the maximum extent achievable, such that:

• No new non-consensual impositions occur after ttt, except where an agent has knowingly consented to the relevant constraints, and except where residual constraints are genuinely unavoidable under the best attainable physics.

• All agents have access to BPW-aligned mechanisms (e.g., consent-gated interaction, private worldspaces, opt-in shared spaces) sufficient to avoid or exit conflict.

• The universal shared hub (or its best analogue) functions as an opt-in coordination space where non-consensual experience is prevented by design.

Weak BPW is not THE BPW because:

• Past impositions that occurred before ttt still occurred and remain part of history, and

• Any persistent consequences of those past impositions (deaths, irreversible losses, historical facts) may remain unchangeable.

Clarification

Weak BPW is an asymptotic/forward ideal: it is the best approximation to BPW that a universe with irreversible history can reach. It measures success by eliminating future imposition, not by erasing the moral valence of the past.

Optional add-on lines (if you want to be explicit)

• Weak BPW may still contain negative moral valence derived from pre-ttt events and irreversible constraints, even if no new impositions occur.

• Weak BPW can be approached in degrees: the closer the post-ttt world comes to preventing all non-consensual constraints, the closer it is to THE BPW.

Quick contrast block (Strong vs Weak)

• Strong BPW (THE BPW): no involuntary imposition exists anywhere in the total history/structure of reality.

• Weak BPW (Forward BPW): involuntary imposition is eliminated prospectively after a transition point, but the past cannot be undone.